
Interim Regional Minister Rick Hamilton, has provided some commentary (in alphabetical order) on each of our semifinalists (now culled to Final Four)
Heartland Waters: This name references our geography indirectly and emphasizes the importance of “waters” to our region. Just as “Great Lakes” is not necessarily an identifier for the congregations of Central and Southern Illinois, “Heartland” may not resonate with Michiganders. An additional consideration is whether the name creates confusion with an existing fellowship group within the college of Regional Ministers known as the “Heartland Regions” that includes programming for Disciples Women and other groups.
Living Waters: This name references the reality that the entirety of the region is defined by waters. It carries strong Biblical imagery (see this link for verses). Jesus promised us Living Water, water from which we would never be thirsty. A consideration is that a “Living Waters Region” would be the first completely “non-geographic name” for a region. Other non-state names of regions are Great River Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi), and Northern Lights Region (Alaska, Washington, Northern Idaho, Montana).
Many Waters: This name also references the many ways waters surround and define our region. It also carries strong Biblical imagery (see this link for verses). A consideration is that a “Many Waters Region” would be the first completely “non-geographic name” for a region. Other non-state names of regions are Great River Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi), and Northern Lights Region (Alaska, Washington, Northern Idaho, Montana).
Prairies and Pines: This name offers ecological identifiers for all three states. Illinois and Wisconsin are known as prairie states. Both Michigan and Wisconsin are known for their pine forests. A consideration is that a “Prairies and Pines Region” would be the first completely “non-geographic name” for a region. Other non-state names of regions are Great River Region (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi), and Northern Lights
‘Great Waters’ is easy to confuse with ‘Great River.’
April (and/or Jeff) – this worked very well. Great job!
Thanks, Grant!
Thanks, Kerry.
I really liked
IL-MI-WI Region
This way, there is no confusion for persons of other regions who may have no idea of who and where we are.
However, if we want to keep the name open-ended with a view to eventually including other regions in this part of the country with us, then it makes sense to keep the name kind of nebulous.
From SE IL where there are rivers, but few lakes.
Doris, make sure to vote for your faves!
Is it too late to offer, “Lake Michigan Region”?
It IS too late, Randy. Please do vote for your faves, though!
Excellent choices! Great work!!
MILLIONS MUST VOTE FOR GREAT LAKES REGION WE MUST VOTE MAX
How did new dimensions not win, it’s so good?
It didn’t get many votes, Leo!
Love Heartland
I also like the combination of Many Living Waters…If it is close between the two. Dr. Susan Street-Beavers
Many Waters has an Indigenous Peoples echo and might give recognition not only to the original owners of the land but the number of people who live in the area, even if not named.
Great thoughts, Shirley!
Living Waters works well.